Independent restaurant ratings analysis

China Chef

16 Pedder Street, Morecambe, LA4 5DZ
Oriental · Chinese

Eat Score64.2Our measure, out of 100. How it works
Just Eat rating5/5The stars Just Eat shows. × 20 = 100
Rating gap35.8Points between Just Eat’s 100 and our 64.2. About the gap
Awaiting InspectionFood hygiene, inspected Jan 1901
313Ratings counted
313Total ratings
78%In 4–5 star buckets
13%In 1–2 star buckets

Food hygiene rating from the Food Standards Agency or Food Standards Scotland, as shown on Just Eat.

Just Eat gives China Chef in Morecambe a rating of 5 out of 5, from 313 of its 313 ratings (100%); Just Eat says its rating uses the previous 12 months. Of those counted, 78% are in the 4–5 star buckets and 13% in the 1–2 star buckets. Its Eat Score, yeet.food's independent measure, is 64.2 out of 100. It ranks 9th of 42 rated takeaways in LA4 and 26th of 217 in Lancaster (LA).

Ratings snapshot: . These are historical ratings, not a live assessment.

Quality & delivery

RatingsGoodNeutralPoor
Quality
313 ratings
82.1%5.1%12.8%
Delivery
313 ratings
76.4%12.8%10.9%

Good means 4–5 stars for quality, or “Amazing” delivery. Component labels inferred from Just Eat’s data.

What these numbers mean

The counted sample is the sum of Just Eat’s five rating buckets. Its published explanation describes a median score from the previous 12 months. The broader total includes ratings outside this sample; these aggregates do not tell us why each rating was excluded. Buckets group half-star ratings, so the 4–5 bucket percentage is not an exact count of individual four- and five-star reviews.

13% fall in the 1–2 star buckets. Our “Often terrible” label means more than 15% fall in those buckets, with at least 20 counted ratings.

Its Eat Score is 64.2 out of 100. The Eat Score is our own measure, and higher is better: it is the Bayesian-adjusted share of counted ratings in the 4–5 star buckets, minus the full adjusted share in the 1–2 star buckets. It is not Just Eat’s rating.

How the Eat Score works · Just Eat’s ratings explanation